www.dl2rum.de

Thank you, Tom.

Based on the above references, the official CQ WAZ list and this ITU zone map , here's the answer to your question: UA9X Komi DXCC: UA (Eu) CQ WAZ: 17 (As) ITU: 19, 20, 29, or 30 UA9F Perm DXCC: UA (Eu) CQ WAZ: 17 (As) ITU: 20 (north of N 60) or 30 (south of N 60) UA9S Orenburg DXCC: UA9 (As) CQ WAZ ...

As far as I can see from http://www.arrl.org/awards-blog ***And from 1 December, 2011 forward, any QSO (with any date) with stations using the following prefixes, count for European Russia:***?? Any call with the prefixes UA through UI, or the prefix U, and the numbers 8, and 9, followed by a suffix ...

When you make the update, can you check this as well? This is that European UA9X callsign which belongs to ITU 20 WAZ 17, but the DXCC field does not use the log field - it guesses ITU 29 WAZ 16.

Perhaps that is the wanted behavior, though?

You are right, zone 29 is indicated as 20 due to a wrong written number. This will be fixed in the next update. Thanks. That should make my bearings more correct. Zone 19 should work fine. As far as I know, ITU zone 19 is applicable for UA1N, UA1O, UA1Y and UA1Z. Those prefixes are indeed mapped to ...

DL2RUM wrote:

• ITU 19: KP71LL
• ITU 20: LP67LL
• ITU 29: KO85LL
• ITU 30: LO66LL

It seems that only 20 and 30 are correct at my machine. QSOs from zone 29 and 19 are mapped in zone 20. Can you check the code?

I'm running RUMlog 5.0.7, but the same issue was present in 4.9.1 I am confused about the DXCC.rsd locator fields for Russia. For some reason, European Russia always gets shown as up in LP66 area, while Asiatic Russia gets shown as being on the European side of the Urals. Only UA8 and UA2 ...